Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Henry's Law
Primary Sponsor
Michael LeeRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
Henry's Law requires dentists who administer general anesthesia or sedation to report serious adverse events (patient deaths, permanent brain damage, hospital admissions, or specific medical emergencies) to the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners within 72 hours to 30 days depending on severity. The bill also directs a UNC study to evaluate whether a second anesthesia-qualified provider should be present during deep sedation procedures, funded with $100,000.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill enhances patient safety by creating accountability and transparency when serious complications occur during dental anesthesia procedures.
- •They contend that mandatory reporting allows the Board to investigate problems, identify unsafe practices, and protect the public by preventing dentists with safety violations from continuing to administer anesthesia.
- •The study on second-provider requirements addresses concerns about whether current staffing standards are adequate for high-risk sedation.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the reporting requirements impose administrative burdens on dentists and could lead to defensive practices or increased liability concerns.
- •Some may question whether mandatory reporting of all adverse events could discourage dentists from offering anesthesia services, potentially reducing patient access to sedation options for dental procedures.
- •Others might contend that the study's cost and timeline add governmental expense without clear evidence that changes to anesthesia provider requirements are necessary.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.